Afghanistan vs South Sudan: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Afghanistan
8.8%
in 2025
South Sudan
9.8%
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
24th
South Sudan rank
22nd
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Afghanistan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 9.8% against 8.8% in Afghanistan, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 22nd of 110 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.6% | 9.4% | 0.2% | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 9.3% | 9.1% | 0.3% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Afghanistan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 9.8% against 8.8% in Afghanistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 1.0%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and South Sudan rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Afghanistan ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 22nd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.