Indonesia vs Zambia: Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)
Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) over time
- Indonesia
- Zambia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 2.52 USD_PPP/cap against 2.52 USD_PPP/cap in Zambia, a difference of 0 USD_PPP/cap.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 27th and Zambia ranks 27th of 34 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.11 USD_PPP/cap | 7.8 USD_PPP/cap | 5.69 USD_PPP/cap | Zambia |
| 2020s | 2.44 USD_PPP/cap | 2.89 USD_PPP/cap | 0.4475 USD_PPP/cap | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base), Indonesia or Zambia?
- Indonesia, at 2.52 USD_PPP/cap against 2.52 USD_PPP/cap in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) between Indonesia and Zambia?
- 0 USD_PPP/cap, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Zambia rank globally for average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)?
- Indonesia ranks 27th and Zambia ranks 27th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base period) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.