Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
10.95 USD_PPP/cap
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
2.94 USD_PPP/cap
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.557.51012.5200120122023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 10.95 USD_PPP/cap against 2.94 USD_PPP/cap in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 8.01 USD_PPP/cap.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 3.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 34 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 3.15 USD_PPP/cap 1.09 USD_PPP/cap 2.06 USD_PPP/cap Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 4.57 USD_PPP/cap 4.68 USD_PPP/cap 0.1067 USD_PPP/cap United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 11.4 USD_PPP/cap 2.94 USD_PPP/cap 8.46 USD_PPP/cap Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base), Bosnia and Herzegovina or United Republic of Tanzania?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 10.95 USD_PPP/cap against 2.94 USD_PPP/cap in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Republic of Tanzania?
8.01 USD_PPP/cap, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Republic of Tanzania?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base period) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/average-hourly-earnings-of-employees-in-rural-areas-2021-base-period-value-all-age-ranges/bosnia-and-herzegovina/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/average-hourly-earnings-of-employees-in-rural-areas-2021-base-period-value-all-age-ranges/bosnia-and-herzegovina/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base period) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
USD_PPP/cap
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
41 places, 512 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.