Bhutan vs Philippines: Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)
Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) over time
- Bhutan
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 5.17 USD_PPP/cap against 4.44 USD_PPP/cap in Bhutan, a difference of 0.73 USD_PPP/cap.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Philippines ahead.
Bhutan ranks 15th and Philippines ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.98 USD_PPP/cap | 3.83 USD_PPP/cap | 0.15 USD_PPP/cap | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 4.51 USD_PPP/cap | 4.57 USD_PPP/cap | 0.06 USD_PPP/cap | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base), Bhutan or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 5.17 USD_PPP/cap against 4.44 USD_PPP/cap in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base) between Bhutan and Philippines?
- 0.73 USD_PPP/cap, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Bhutan and Philippines rank globally for average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base)?
- Bhutan ranks 15th and Philippines ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Average hourly earnings of employees in rural areas (2021 base period) — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.