Czechia vs Lithuania: Augmented Human Development Index (excluding income)
Czechia
0.6558
in 2020
Lithuania
0.6618
in 2020
Czechia rank
27th
Lithuania rank
26th
Augmented Human Development Index (excluding income) over time
- Czechia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.6618 against 0.6558 in Czechia, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 162 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 4 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2057 | 0.1472 | 0.0586 | Czechia |
| 1990s | 0.497 | 0.4678 | 0.0292 | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5654 | 0.5136 | 0.0518 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.6257 | 0.5929 | 0.0328 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.6558 | 0.6618 | 0.006 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher augmented human development index (excluding income), Czechia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 0.6618 against 0.6558 in Czechia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in augmented human development index (excluding income) between Czechia and Lithuania?
- 0.006, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for augmented human development index (excluding income)?
- Czechia ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Leandro Prados de la Escosura (2021) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Augmented Human Development Index (excluding income). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The AHDI seeks to give a historical perspective on human development, in four dimensions: healthy life, knowledge, and civil and political freedom. This indicator excludes the income-based wellbeing component.