Croatia vs Hong Kong, China: Augmented Human Development Index vs. GDP per capita
Croatia
0.632
in 2020
Hong Kong, China
0.6184
in 2020
Croatia rank
35th
Hong Kong, China rank
38th
Augmented Human Development Index vs. GDP per capita over time
- Croatia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.632 against 0.6184 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0136.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Croatia ranks 35th and Hong Kong, China ranks 38th of 162 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3196 | 0.3826 | 0.063 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.3593 | 0.4629 | 0.1036 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 0.5393 | 0.536 | 0.0033 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.608 | 0.612 | 0.004 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.632 | 0.6184 | 0.0137 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher augmented human development index vs. gdp per capita, Croatia or Hong Kong, China?
- Croatia, at 0.632 against 0.6184 in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in augmented human development index vs. gdp per capita between Croatia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.0136, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Hong Kong, China?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for augmented human development index vs. gdp per capita?
- Croatia ranks 35th and Hong Kong, China ranks 38th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Leandro Prados de la Escosura (2021) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Augmented Human Development Index vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The AHDI seeks to give a historical perspective on human development, in four dimensions: healthy life, knowledge, a decent standard of living, and civil and political freedom.