Ecuador vs Namibia: Annual growth of the gross capital formation
Ecuador
-5.4%
in 2024
Namibia
-5.9%
in 2024
Ecuador rank
137th
Namibia rank
139th
Annual growth of the gross capital formation over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -5.4% against -5.9% in Namibia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.3% | 9.7% | 4.6% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 1.0% | 4.1% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | -0.4% | 15.6% | 16.0% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual growth of the gross capital formation, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at -5.4% against -5.9% in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual growth of the gross capital formation between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for annual growth of the gross capital formation?
- Ecuador ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as Annual growth of the gross capital formation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%).