China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
-4.8%
in 2024
Latvia
7.0%
in 2023
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
32nd
Latvia rank
31st

Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Latvia
-1001020200020122024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 7.0% against -4.8% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 11.8%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 31st of 32 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Macao Special Administrative Region averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 4.9% 1.7% 3.2% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2010s 4.5% 1.4% 3.1% China, Macao Special Administrative Region
2020s 2.0% 3.9% 1.9% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Latvia?
Latvia, at 7.0% against -4.8% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia?
11.8%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia rank globally for annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 32nd and Latvia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-growth-of-the-general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-growth-of-the-general-government-final-consumption-expenditure-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/latvia/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
213 places, 4,776 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed