South Korea vs Uruguay: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

South Korea
63.28 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Uruguay
62.97 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
South Korea rank
46th
Uruguay rank
48th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • South Korea
  • Uruguay
0204060196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 63.28 grams of protein per day per capita against 62.97 grams of protein per day per capita in Uruguay, a difference of 0.31 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

South Korea ranks 46th and Uruguay ranks 48th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 6.76 grams of protein per day per capita 56.63 grams of protein per day per capita 49.86 grams of protein per day per capita Uruguay
1970s 12.77 grams of protein per day per capita 55.06 grams of protein per day per capita 42.29 grams of protein per day per capita Uruguay
1980s 21.8 grams of protein per day per capita 49.91 grams of protein per day per capita 28.11 grams of protein per day per capita Uruguay
1990s 31.78 grams of protein per day per capita 52.92 grams of protein per day per capita 21.14 grams of protein per day per capita Uruguay
2000s 38.99 grams of protein per day per capita 48.67 grams of protein per day per capita 9.68 grams of protein per day per capita Uruguay
2010s 54.8 grams of protein per day per capita 53.93 grams of protein per day per capita 0.866 grams of protein per day per capita South Korea
2020s 61.66 grams of protein per day per capita 60.88 grams of protein per day per capita 0.7775 grams of protein per day per capita South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, South Korea or Uruguay?
South Korea, at 63.28 grams of protein per day per capita against 62.97 grams of protein per day per capita in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between South Korea and Uruguay?
0.31 grams of protein per day per capita, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Uruguay rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
South Korea ranks 46th and Uruguay ranks 48th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Uruguay: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/korea-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/korea-rep/uruguay/">South Korea vs Uruguay: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.