Kiribati vs Saudi Arabia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Kiribati
45.35 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
44.86 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Kiribati rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
96th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saudi Arabia
102030405060196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 45.35 grams of protein per day per capita against 44.86 grams of protein per day per capita in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.49 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 17.92 grams of protein per day per capita 14.55 grams of protein per day per capita 3.38 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati
1970s 22.48 grams of protein per day per capita 26.3 grams of protein per day per capita 3.82 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia
1980s 27.15 grams of protein per day per capita 50.89 grams of protein per day per capita 23.74 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia
1990s 30.66 grams of protein per day per capita 39.73 grams of protein per day per capita 9.07 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia
2000s 33.23 grams of protein per day per capita 38.54 grams of protein per day per capita 5.31 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia
2010s 39.95 grams of protein per day per capita 44.59 grams of protein per day per capita 4.63 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia
2020s 46.1 grams of protein per day per capita 46.89 grams of protein per day per capita 0.786 grams of protein per day per capita Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Kiribati or Saudi Arabia?
Kiribati, at 45.35 grams of protein per day per capita against 44.86 grams of protein per day per capita in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Kiribati and Saudi Arabia?
0.49 grams of protein per day per capita, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Saudi Arabia rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Kiribati ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 96th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saudi Arabia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/kiribati/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/kiribati/saudi-arabia/">Kiribati vs Saudi Arabia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.