Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Guinea-Bissau
8.93 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Togo
9.5 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau rank
184th
Togo rank
182nd

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Togo
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 9.5 grams of protein per day per capita against 8.93 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.57 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Togo ranks 182nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 6 and Togo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 7.67 grams of protein per day per capita 6.16 grams of protein per day per capita 1.51 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1970s 8.82 grams of protein per day per capita 6.54 grams of protein per day per capita 2.28 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1980s 8.3 grams of protein per day per capita 7.84 grams of protein per day per capita 0.4637 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1990s 9.2 grams of protein per day per capita 7.79 grams of protein per day per capita 1.42 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2000s 8.34 grams of protein per day per capita 6.98 grams of protein per day per capita 1.36 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2010s 10.56 grams of protein per day per capita 10.78 grams of protein per day per capita 0.2179 grams of protein per day per capita Togo
2020s 9.31 grams of protein per day per capita 9.04 grams of protein per day per capita 0.2658 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Guinea-Bissau or Togo?
Togo, at 9.5 grams of protein per day per capita against 8.93 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
0.57 grams of protein per day per capita, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Togo rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Togo ranks 182nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/guinea-bissau/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/guinea-bissau/togo/">Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.