Guatemala vs Tunisia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Guatemala
33.98 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Tunisia
34.12 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Guatemala rank
118th
Tunisia rank
116th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Guatemala
  • Tunisia
101520253035196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 34.12 grams of protein per day per capita against 33.98 grams of protein per day per capita in Guatemala, a difference of 0.14 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 118th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 11.14 grams of protein per day per capita 11.04 grams of protein per day per capita 0.0973 grams of protein per day per capita Guatemala
1970s 10.83 grams of protein per day per capita 13.88 grams of protein per day per capita 3.06 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia
1980s 10.16 grams of protein per day per capita 18.17 grams of protein per day per capita 8.01 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia
1990s 12.16 grams of protein per day per capita 19.8 grams of protein per day per capita 7.64 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia
2000s 16.99 grams of protein per day per capita 24.35 grams of protein per day per capita 7.35 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia
2010s 25.47 grams of protein per day per capita 30.8 grams of protein per day per capita 5.33 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia
2020s 30.87 grams of protein per day per capita 33.27 grams of protein per day per capita 2.4 grams of protein per day per capita Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Guatemala or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 34.12 grams of protein per day per capita against 33.98 grams of protein per day per capita in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Guatemala and Tunisia?
0.14 grams of protein per day per capita, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Tunisia rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Guatemala ranks 118th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Tunisia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/guatemala/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/guatemala/tunisia/">Guatemala vs Tunisia: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.