French Polynesia vs Poland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

French Polynesia
71.38 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Poland
72.47 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
30th
Poland rank
28th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Poland
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 72.47 grams of protein per day per capita against 71.38 grams of protein per day per capita in French Polynesia, a difference of 1.09 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 30th and Poland ranks 28th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 33.59 grams of protein per day per capita 46.22 grams of protein per day per capita 12.63 grams of protein per day per capita Poland
1970s 37.74 grams of protein per day per capita 59.76 grams of protein per day per capita 22.02 grams of protein per day per capita Poland
1980s 40.2 grams of protein per day per capita 56.35 grams of protein per day per capita 16.15 grams of protein per day per capita Poland
1990s 55.45 grams of protein per day per capita 51.02 grams of protein per day per capita 4.43 grams of protein per day per capita French Polynesia
2000s 63.73 grams of protein per day per capita 50.3 grams of protein per day per capita 13.44 grams of protein per day per capita French Polynesia
2010s 71.63 grams of protein per day per capita 63.63 grams of protein per day per capita 8 grams of protein per day per capita French Polynesia
2020s 72.59 grams of protein per day per capita 73.03 grams of protein per day per capita 0.44 grams of protein per day per capita Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, French Polynesia or Poland?
Poland, at 72.47 grams of protein per day per capita against 71.38 grams of protein per day per capita in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between French Polynesia and Poland?
1.09 grams of protein per day per capita, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Poland rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
French Polynesia ranks 30th and Poland ranks 28th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Poland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/french-polynesia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/french-polynesia/poland/">French Polynesia vs Poland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.