Ecuador vs El Salvador: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Ecuador
40.48 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
El Salvador
36.98 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Ecuador rank
109th
El Salvador rank
112th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 40.48 grams of protein per day per capita against 36.98 grams of protein per day per capita in El Salvador, a difference of 3.5 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 109th and El Salvador ranks 112th of 192 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 18.28 grams of protein per day per capita 12.07 grams of protein per day per capita 6.21 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
1970s 20.81 grams of protein per day per capita 12.9 grams of protein per day per capita 7.92 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
1980s 20.89 grams of protein per day per capita 13.04 grams of protein per day per capita 7.85 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
1990s 25.06 grams of protein per day per capita 15.45 grams of protein per day per capita 9.61 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
2000s 31.67 grams of protein per day per capita 23.46 grams of protein per day per capita 8.21 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
2010s 38.86 grams of protein per day per capita 31.2 grams of protein per day per capita 7.66 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador
2020s 39.25 grams of protein per day per capita 35.58 grams of protein per day per capita 3.67 grams of protein per day per capita Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Ecuador or El Salvador?
Ecuador, at 40.48 grams of protein per day per capita against 36.98 grams of protein per day per capita in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Ecuador and El Salvador?
3.5 grams of protein per day per capita, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Ecuador ranks 109th and El Salvador ranks 112th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs El Salvador: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/ecuador/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/ecuador/el-salvador/">Ecuador vs El Salvador: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.