Djibouti vs Eswatini: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Djibouti
15.23 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Eswatini
16.05 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Djibouti rank
166th
Eswatini rank
163rd

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Djibouti
  • Eswatini
1015202530196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 16.05 grams of protein per day per capita against 15.23 grams of protein per day per capita in Djibouti, a difference of 0.82 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Djibouti ranks 166th and Eswatini ranks 163rd of 192 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 16.77 grams of protein per day per capita 20.91 grams of protein per day per capita 4.13 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
1970s 15.64 grams of protein per day per capita 19.43 grams of protein per day per capita 3.79 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
1980s 15.16 grams of protein per day per capita 19.02 grams of protein per day per capita 3.85 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
1990s 12.28 grams of protein per day per capita 17.49 grams of protein per day per capita 5.2 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
2000s 15.27 grams of protein per day per capita 21.55 grams of protein per day per capita 6.28 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
2010s 14.47 grams of protein per day per capita 19.47 grams of protein per day per capita 5 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini
2020s 15.38 grams of protein per day per capita 17.74 grams of protein per day per capita 2.36 grams of protein per day per capita Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Djibouti or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 16.05 grams of protein per day per capita against 15.23 grams of protein per day per capita in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Djibouti and Eswatini?
0.82 grams of protein per day per capita, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Djibouti ranks 166th and Eswatini ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Eswatini: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/djibouti/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/djibouti/eswatini/">Djibouti vs Eswatini: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.