Denmark vs United States: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Denmark
86.75 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
United States
82.9 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Denmark rank
4th
United States rank
7th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Denmark
  • United States
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 86.75 grams of protein per day per capita against 82.9 grams of protein per day per capita in United States, a difference of 3.85 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States ahead.

Denmark ranks 4th and United States ranks 7th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and United States in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark United States Difference Ahead
1960s 46.81 grams of protein per day per capita 66.63 grams of protein per day per capita 19.82 grams of protein per day per capita United States
1970s 49.83 grams of protein per day per capita 66.75 grams of protein per day per capita 16.92 grams of protein per day per capita United States
1980s 59.53 grams of protein per day per capita 68.38 grams of protein per day per capita 8.84 grams of protein per day per capita United States
1990s 68.4 grams of protein per day per capita 71.17 grams of protein per day per capita 2.77 grams of protein per day per capita United States
2000s 68.61 grams of protein per day per capita 74.16 grams of protein per day per capita 5.55 grams of protein per day per capita United States
2010s 80.47 grams of protein per day per capita 80.31 grams of protein per day per capita 0.163 grams of protein per day per capita Denmark
2020s 88.14 grams of protein per day per capita 83.24 grams of protein per day per capita 4.9 grams of protein per day per capita Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Denmark or United States?
Denmark, at 86.75 grams of protein per day per capita against 82.9 grams of protein per day per capita in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Denmark and United States?
3.85 grams of protein per day per capita, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and United States rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Denmark ranks 4th and United States ranks 7th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs United States: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/denmark/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/denmark/united-states/">Denmark vs United States: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.