Denmark vs Iceland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Denmark
86.75 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Iceland
106.46 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Denmark rank
4th
Iceland rank
1st

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Denmark
  • Iceland
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 106.46 grams of protein per day per capita against 86.75 grams of protein per day per capita in Denmark, a difference of 19.71 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 192 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 46.81 grams of protein per day per capita 89.5 grams of protein per day per capita 42.69 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
1970s 49.83 grams of protein per day per capita 93.51 grams of protein per day per capita 43.68 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
1980s 59.53 grams of protein per day per capita 95.96 grams of protein per day per capita 36.43 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
1990s 68.4 grams of protein per day per capita 80.48 grams of protein per day per capita 12.07 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
2000s 68.61 grams of protein per day per capita 94.22 grams of protein per day per capita 25.61 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
2010s 80.47 grams of protein per day per capita 106.5 grams of protein per day per capita 26.03 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland
2020s 88.14 grams of protein per day per capita 105.91 grams of protein per day per capita 17.77 grams of protein per day per capita Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Denmark or Iceland?
Iceland, at 106.46 grams of protein per day per capita against 86.75 grams of protein per day per capita in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Denmark and Iceland?
19.71 grams of protein per day per capita, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Iceland rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Denmark ranks 4th and Iceland ranks 1st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Iceland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/denmark/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/denmark/iceland/">Denmark vs Iceland: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.