Congo vs South Africa: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Congo
34.8 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
South Africa
36.51 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
115th
South Africa rank
113th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
10203040196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 36.51 grams of protein per day per capita against 34.8 grams of protein per day per capita in Congo, a difference of 1.71 grams of protein per day per capita.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 113th of 192 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 13.08 grams of protein per day per capita 25.79 grams of protein per day per capita 12.7 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
1970s 12.41 grams of protein per day per capita 26.59 grams of protein per day per capita 14.18 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
1980s 17.36 grams of protein per day per capita 23.73 grams of protein per day per capita 6.37 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
1990s 16.72 grams of protein per day per capita 23.07 grams of protein per day per capita 6.36 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
2000s 15.97 grams of protein per day per capita 28.15 grams of protein per day per capita 12.18 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
2010s 22.24 grams of protein per day per capita 37.52 grams of protein per day per capita 15.27 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa
2020s 30.46 grams of protein per day per capita 37.85 grams of protein per day per capita 7.38 grams of protein per day per capita South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Congo or South Africa?
South Africa, at 36.51 grams of protein per day per capita against 34.8 grams of protein per day per capita in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Congo and South Africa?
1.71 grams of protein per day per capita, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Congo ranks 115th and South Africa ranks 113th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.