Cape Verde vs Guatemala: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Cape Verde
33.59 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Guatemala
33.98 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
119th
Guatemala rank
118th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Guatemala
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 33.98 grams of protein per day per capita against 33.59 grams of protein per day per capita in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.39 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 119th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 4.62 grams of protein per day per capita 11.14 grams of protein per day per capita 6.51 grams of protein per day per capita Guatemala
1970s 9.5 grams of protein per day per capita 10.83 grams of protein per day per capita 1.33 grams of protein per day per capita Guatemala
1980s 16.62 grams of protein per day per capita 10.16 grams of protein per day per capita 6.46 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
1990s 20.47 grams of protein per day per capita 12.16 grams of protein per day per capita 8.32 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2000s 25.15 grams of protein per day per capita 16.99 grams of protein per day per capita 8.16 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2010s 31.37 grams of protein per day per capita 25.47 grams of protein per day per capita 5.9 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2020s 33.19 grams of protein per day per capita 30.87 grams of protein per day per capita 2.32 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Cape Verde or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 33.98 grams of protein per day per capita against 33.59 grams of protein per day per capita in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Cape Verde and Guatemala?
0.39 grams of protein per day per capita, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Guatemala rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Cape Verde ranks 119th and Guatemala ranks 118th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Guatemala: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/cabo-verde/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/cabo-verde/guatemala/">Cape Verde vs Guatemala: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.