Angola vs Djibouti: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita

Angola
14.33 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Djibouti
15.23 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Angola rank
169th
Djibouti rank
166th

Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita over time

  • Angola
  • Djibouti
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 15.23 grams of protein per day per capita against 14.33 grams of protein per day per capita in Angola, a difference of 0.9 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.

Angola ranks 169th and Djibouti ranks 166th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Djibouti in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Djibouti Difference Ahead
1960s 9.14 grams of protein per day per capita 16.77 grams of protein per day per capita 7.63 grams of protein per day per capita Djibouti
1970s 10.78 grams of protein per day per capita 15.64 grams of protein per day per capita 4.86 grams of protein per day per capita Djibouti
1980s 15.83 grams of protein per day per capita 15.16 grams of protein per day per capita 0.6634 grams of protein per day per capita Angola
1990s 9.72 grams of protein per day per capita 12.28 grams of protein per day per capita 2.56 grams of protein per day per capita Djibouti
2000s 11.77 grams of protein per day per capita 15.27 grams of protein per day per capita 3.5 grams of protein per day per capita Djibouti
2010s 18.67 grams of protein per day per capita 14.47 grams of protein per day per capita 4.2 grams of protein per day per capita Angola
2020s 14.93 grams of protein per day per capita 15.38 grams of protein per day per capita 0.455 grams of protein per day per capita Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita, Angola or Djibouti?
Djibouti, at 15.23 grams of protein per day per capita against 14.33 grams of protein per day per capita in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita between Angola and Djibouti?
0.9 grams of protein per day per capita, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Djibouti?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Djibouti rank globally for protein supply from animal foods vs. gdp per capita?
Angola ranks 169th and Djibouti ranks 166th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Djibouti: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/angola/djibouti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-vs-gdp/angola/djibouti/">Angola vs Djibouti: Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protein supply from animal foods vs. GDP per capita
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.