Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Thailand: Animal protein consumption

Saint Kitts and Nevis
9.56 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Thailand
9.62 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
28th
Thailand rank
27th

Animal protein consumption over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Thailand
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 9.62 grams of protein per day per capita against 9.56 grams of protein per day per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.06 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 27th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 4 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 4.04 grams of protein per day per capita 4.65 grams of protein per day per capita 0.6072 grams of protein per day per capita Thailand
1970s 12.35 grams of protein per day per capita 6.43 grams of protein per day per capita 5.92 grams of protein per day per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 12.59 grams of protein per day per capita 6.12 grams of protein per day per capita 6.47 grams of protein per day per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 6.63 grams of protein per day per capita 8.85 grams of protein per day per capita 2.22 grams of protein per day per capita Thailand
2000s 9.9 grams of protein per day per capita 8.79 grams of protein per day per capita 1.11 grams of protein per day per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 9.64 grams of protein per day per capita 8.53 grams of protein per day per capita 1.1 grams of protein per day per capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 9.55 grams of protein per day per capita 9.62 grams of protein per day per capita 0.07 grams of protein per day per capita Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal protein consumption, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Thailand?
Thailand, at 9.62 grams of protein per day per capita against 9.56 grams of protein per day per capita in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
0.06 grams of protein per day per capita, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Thailand rank globally for animal protein consumption?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 27th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Thailand: Animal protein consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/st-kitts-and-nevis/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/st-kitts-and-nevis/thailand/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Thailand: Animal protein consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal protein consumption
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.