Latvia vs Tonga: Animal protein consumption
Latvia
8.43 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Tonga
8.28 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Latvia rank
33rd
Tonga rank
35th
Animal protein consumption over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 8.43 grams of protein per day per capita against 8.28 grams of protein per day per capita in Tonga, a difference of 0.15 grams of protein per day per capita.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 33rd and Tonga ranks 35th of 192 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.29 grams of protein per day per capita | 8.2 grams of protein per day per capita | 0.0914 grams of protein per day per capita | Latvia |
| 2020s | 8.41 grams of protein per day per capita | 8.23 grams of protein per day per capita | 0.1762 grams of protein per day per capita | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher animal protein consumption, Latvia or Tonga?
- Latvia, at 8.43 grams of protein per day per capita against 8.28 grams of protein per day per capita in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Latvia and Tonga?
- 0.15 grams of protein per day per capita, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for animal protein consumption?
- Latvia ranks 33rd and Tonga ranks 35th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.