Hong Kong, China vs Kiribati: Animal protein consumption

Hong Kong, China
15.69 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Kiribati
22.62 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
5th
Kiribati rank
3rd

Animal protein consumption over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Kiribati
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 22.62 grams of protein per day per capita against 15.69 grams of protein per day per capita in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 6.93 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.4 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 3rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 11.22 grams of protein per day per capita 10.71 grams of protein per day per capita 0.5103 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong, China
1970s 13.89 grams of protein per day per capita 13.54 grams of protein per day per capita 0.3486 grams of protein per day per capita Hong Kong, China
1980s 13.72 grams of protein per day per capita 18.36 grams of protein per day per capita 4.64 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati
1990s 15.81 grams of protein per day per capita 20.48 grams of protein per day per capita 4.67 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati
2000s 16.09 grams of protein per day per capita 19.15 grams of protein per day per capita 3.06 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati
2010s 15.86 grams of protein per day per capita 23.44 grams of protein per day per capita 7.58 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati
2020s 15.59 grams of protein per day per capita 23.18 grams of protein per day per capita 7.59 grams of protein per day per capita Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal protein consumption, Hong Kong, China or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 22.62 grams of protein per day per capita against 15.69 grams of protein per day per capita in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Hong Kong, China and Kiribati?
6.93 grams of protein per day per capita, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Kiribati rank globally for animal protein consumption?
Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 3rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Kiribati: Animal protein consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/kiribati/">Hong Kong, China vs Kiribati: Animal protein consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal protein consumption
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.