Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Animal protein consumption

Guinea-Bissau
0.64 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.69 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
178th
Zimbabwe rank
175th

Animal protein consumption over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.69 grams of protein per day per capita against 0.64 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.05 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6377 grams of protein per day per capita 0.5102 grams of protein per day per capita 0.1275 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1970s 1.02 grams of protein per day per capita 0.4839 grams of protein per day per capita 0.5345 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.8907 grams of protein per day per capita 0.6976 grams of protein per day per capita 0.1931 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
1990s 1.24 grams of protein per day per capita 0.8559 grams of protein per day per capita 0.3887 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.5765 grams of protein per day per capita 0.4078 grams of protein per day per capita 0.1687 grams of protein per day per capita Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.526 grams of protein per day per capita 1.16 grams of protein per day per capita 0.637 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe
2020s 0.635 grams of protein per day per capita 0.7575 grams of protein per day per capita 0.1225 grams of protein per day per capita Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal protein consumption, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.69 grams of protein per day per capita against 0.64 grams of protein per day per capita in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
0.05 grams of protein per day per capita, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for animal protein consumption?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 178th and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Animal protein consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Animal protein consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal protein consumption
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.