Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Animal protein consumption

Burkina Faso
2.97 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Cape Verde
2.75 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
122nd
Cape Verde rank
125th

Animal protein consumption over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Cape Verde
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2.97 grams of protein per day per capita against 2.75 grams of protein per day per capita in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.22 grams of protein per day per capita.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 122nd and Cape Verde ranks 125th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4086 grams of protein per day per capita 1.91 grams of protein per day per capita 1.5 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
1970s 0.3973 grams of protein per day per capita 3.54 grams of protein per day per capita 3.15 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
1980s 0.5104 grams of protein per day per capita 7.03 grams of protein per day per capita 6.52 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
1990s 0.6146 grams of protein per day per capita 4.89 grams of protein per day per capita 4.28 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2000s 0.7186 grams of protein per day per capita 4.93 grams of protein per day per capita 4.21 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2010s 2.03 grams of protein per day per capita 3.4 grams of protein per day per capita 1.36 grams of protein per day per capita Cape Verde
2020s 3.01 grams of protein per day per capita 2.77 grams of protein per day per capita 0.235 grams of protein per day per capita Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal protein consumption, Burkina Faso or Cape Verde?
Burkina Faso, at 2.97 grams of protein per day per capita against 2.75 grams of protein per day per capita in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Burkina Faso and Cape Verde?
0.22 grams of protein per day per capita, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cape Verde?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Cape Verde rank globally for animal protein consumption?
Burkina Faso ranks 122nd and Cape Verde ranks 125th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Animal protein consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/burkina-faso/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/burkina-faso/cabo-verde/">Burkina Faso vs Cape Verde: Animal protein consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal protein consumption
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.