Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Animal protein consumption

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.74 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.77 grams of protein per day per capita
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
150th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
148th

Animal protein consumption over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
012345196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 1.77 grams of protein per day per capita against 1.74 grams of protein per day per capita in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.03 grams of protein per day per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 150th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 148th of 192 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1721 grams of protein per day per capita 3.16 grams of protein per day per capita 2.99 grams of protein per day per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.41 grams of protein per day per capita 2.57 grams of protein per day per capita 1.16 grams of protein per day per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 1.63 grams of protein per day per capita 1.85 grams of protein per day per capita 0.219 grams of protein per day per capita Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.71 grams of protein per day per capita 1.85 grams of protein per day per capita 0.1425 grams of protein per day per capita Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher animal protein consumption, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 1.77 grams of protein per day per capita against 1.74 grams of protein per day per capita in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in animal protein consumption between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.03 grams of protein per day per capita, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for animal protein consumption?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 150th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 148th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Animal protein consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Animal protein consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/animal-protein-consumption/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Animal protein consumption</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Animal protein consumption
Unit
grams of protein per day per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,213 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.