Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Tanzania, United Republic of
855.37 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Zimbabwe
826.38 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
162nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
2505007501.0k1.2k1.5k199120082025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 855.37 constant 2015 US$ against 826.38 constant 2015 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 28.99 constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 559.96 constant 2015 US$ 1,387 constant 2015 US$ 827.09 constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 632.91 constant 2015 US$ 854.34 constant 2015 US$ 221.43 constant 2015 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 791.11 constant 2015 US$ 520.23 constant 2015 US$ 270.88 constant 2015 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 841.66 constant 2015 US$ 778.4 constant 2015 US$ 63.26 constant 2015 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 855.37 constant 2015 US$ against 826.38 constant 2015 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
28.99 constant 2015 US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 162nd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.