Singapore vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Singapore
32,757 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
37,801 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Singapore rank
31st
United Arab Emirates rank
28th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Singapore
  • United Arab Emirates
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120082025

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 37,801 constant 2015 US$ against 32,757 constant 2015 US$ in Singapore, a difference of 5,044 constant 2015 US$.

That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 35,650 constant 2015 US$ 24,335 constant 2015 US$ 11,315 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2000s 25,179 constant 2015 US$ 29,546 constant 2015 US$ 4,368 constant 2015 US$ United Arab Emirates
2010s 25,805 constant 2015 US$ 19,278 constant 2015 US$ 6,527 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2020s 35,392 constant 2015 US$ 36,663 constant 2015 US$ 1,271 constant 2015 US$ United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Singapore or United Arab Emirates?
United Arab Emirates, at 37,801 constant 2015 US$ against 32,757 constant 2015 US$ in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Singapore and United Arab Emirates?
5,044 constant 2015 US$, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United Arab Emirates?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Singapore and United Arab Emirates rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Singapore ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 28th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/singapore/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/singapore/united-arab-emirates/">Singapore vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.