Portugal vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Portugal
27,607 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
South Asia
2,082 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Portugal rank
35th
South Asia rank
35th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Portugal
  • South Asia
010.0k20.0k30.0k199120082025

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 27,607 constant 2015 US$ against 2,082 constant 2015 US$ in South Asia, a difference of 25,525 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Portugal's figure about 13.3 times South Asia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Portugal ranks 35th and South Asia ranks 35th of 175 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal South Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 12,799 constant 2015 US$ 947.48 constant 2015 US$ 11,851 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2000s 11,683 constant 2015 US$ 1,072 constant 2015 US$ 10,611 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2010s 20,369 constant 2015 US$ 1,664 constant 2015 US$ 18,704 constant 2015 US$ Portugal
2020s 27,960 constant 2015 US$ 1,989 constant 2015 US$ 25,971 constant 2015 US$ Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Portugal or South Asia?
Portugal, at 27,607 constant 2015 US$ against 2,082 constant 2015 US$ in South Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Portugal and South Asia?
25,525 constant 2015 US$, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and South Asia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Portugal and South Asia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Portugal ranks 35th and South Asia ranks 35th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/portugal/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/portugal/south-asia/">Portugal vs South Asia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.