Poland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Poland
11,727 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Turkmenistan
12,672 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Poland rank
68th
Turkmenistan rank
65th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Poland
  • Turkmenistan
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199520102025

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 12,672 constant 2015 US$ against 11,727 constant 2015 US$ in Poland, a difference of 945 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 65th of 175 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2010s 6,199 constant 2015 US$ 6,905 constant 2015 US$ 705.43 constant 2015 US$ Turkmenistan
2020s 8,743 constant 2015 US$ 11,152 constant 2015 US$ 2,409 constant 2015 US$ Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Poland or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 12,672 constant 2015 US$ against 11,727 constant 2015 US$ in Poland as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Poland and Turkmenistan?
945 constant 2015 US$, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Turkmenistan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Poland and Turkmenistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Poland ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 65th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/poland/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/poland/turkmenistan/">Poland vs Turkmenistan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.