Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Papua New Guinea
3,496 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Philippines
3,499 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
117th
Philippines rank
116th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Philippines
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199120082025

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 3,499 constant 2015 US$ against 3,496 constant 2015 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 3 constant 2015 US$.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Philippines ranks 116th of 175 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 5,663 constant 2015 US$ 2,554 constant 2015 US$ 3,109 constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 4,914 constant 2015 US$ 2,948 constant 2015 US$ 1,966 constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 3,544 constant 2015 US$ 3,352 constant 2015 US$ 191.45 constant 2015 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Papua New Guinea or Philippines?
Philippines, at 3,499 constant 2015 US$ against 3,496 constant 2015 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
3 constant 2015 US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Philippines rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Philippines ranks 116th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/papua-new-guinea/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/papua-new-guinea/philippines/">Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.