New Zealand vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

New Zealand
55,088 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Upper middle income
7,474 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
New Zealand rank
14th
Upper middle income rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • New Zealand
  • Upper middle income
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 7,474 constant 2015 US$ in Upper middle income, a difference of 47,614 constant 2015 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 7.4 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 175 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 35,061 constant 2015 US$ 1,599 constant 2015 US$ 33,462 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2000s 43,184 constant 2015 US$ 2,271 constant 2015 US$ 40,913 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2010s 49,598 constant 2015 US$ 4,226 constant 2015 US$ 45,372 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2020s 50,634 constant 2015 US$ 6,414 constant 2015 US$ 44,220 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, New Zealand or Upper middle income?
New Zealand, at 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 7,474 constant 2015 US$ in Upper middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between New Zealand and Upper middle income?
47,614 constant 2015 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Upper middle income?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Upper middle income rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
New Zealand ranks 14th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/new-zealand/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/new-zealand/upper-middle-income/">New Zealand vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.