Malawi vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Malawi
495.23 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Zambia
304.36 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Malawi rank
170th
Zambia rank
173rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Malawi
  • Zambia
200400600800199120082025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 495.23 constant 2015 US$ against 304.36 constant 2015 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 190.87 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zambia ahead.

Malawi ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 334.65 constant 2015 US$ 661.69 constant 2015 US$ 327.04 constant 2015 US$ Zambia
2000s 431.74 constant 2015 US$ 505.91 constant 2015 US$ 74.17 constant 2015 US$ Zambia
2010s 532.67 constant 2015 US$ 367 constant 2015 US$ 165.66 constant 2015 US$ Malawi
2020s 520.69 constant 2015 US$ 288.93 constant 2015 US$ 231.76 constant 2015 US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Malawi or Zambia?
Malawi, at 495.23 constant 2015 US$ against 304.36 constant 2015 US$ in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Malawi and Zambia?
190.87 constant 2015 US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Malawi ranks 170th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/malawi/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/malawi/zambia/">Malawi vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.