Luxembourg vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Luxembourg
45,679 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Upper middle income
7,474 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
19th
Upper middle income rank
16th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Upper middle income
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199120082025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 45,679 constant 2015 US$ against 7,474 constant 2015 US$ in Upper middle income, a difference of 38,205 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 6.1 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 19th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 175 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 53,903 constant 2015 US$ 1,732 constant 2015 US$ 52,171 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2000s 47,463 constant 2015 US$ 2,271 constant 2015 US$ 45,192 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2010s 43,127 constant 2015 US$ 4,226 constant 2015 US$ 38,901 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2020s 39,922 constant 2015 US$ 6,591 constant 2015 US$ 33,332 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Luxembourg or Upper middle income?
Luxembourg, at 45,679 constant 2015 US$ against 7,474 constant 2015 US$ in Upper middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Luxembourg and Upper middle income?
38,205 constant 2015 US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Upper middle income?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Upper middle income rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Luxembourg ranks 19th and Upper middle income ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/luxembourg/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/luxembourg/upper-middle-income/">Luxembourg vs Upper middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.