Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Low & middle income
3,793 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Singapore
32,757 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Low & middle income rank
29th
Singapore rank
31st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Singapore
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199120082025

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 32,757 constant 2015 US$ against 3,793 constant 2015 US$ in Low & middle income, a difference of 28,964 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 8.6 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 31st of 46 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 1,346 constant 2015 US$ 35,650 constant 2015 US$ 34,303 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2000s 1,730 constant 2015 US$ 25,179 constant 2015 US$ 23,448 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2010s 2,738 constant 2015 US$ 25,805 constant 2015 US$ 23,067 constant 2015 US$ Singapore
2020s 3,533 constant 2015 US$ 34,953 constant 2015 US$ 31,420 constant 2015 US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Low & middle income or Singapore?
Singapore, at 32,757 constant 2015 US$ against 3,793 constant 2015 US$ in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Low & middle income and Singapore?
28,964 constant 2015 US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Singapore?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Low & middle income and Singapore rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Low & middle income ranks 29th and Singapore ranks 31st of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/low-and-middle-income/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/low-and-middle-income/singapore/">Low & middle income vs Singapore: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.