Lithuania vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Lithuania
22,070 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Slovenia
23,973 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Lithuania rank
40th
Slovenia rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Lithuania
  • Slovenia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199520102025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 23,973 constant 2015 US$ against 22,070 constant 2015 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 1,903 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovenia ahead.

Lithuania ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 175 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,026 constant 2015 US$ 8,835 constant 2015 US$ 4,809 constant 2015 US$ Slovenia
2000s 6,026 constant 2015 US$ 9,915 constant 2015 US$ 3,890 constant 2015 US$ Slovenia
2010s 12,161 constant 2015 US$ 12,839 constant 2015 US$ 678.1 constant 2015 US$ Slovenia
2020s 20,389 constant 2015 US$ 21,557 constant 2015 US$ 1,168 constant 2015 US$ Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Lithuania or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 23,973 constant 2015 US$ against 22,070 constant 2015 US$ in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Lithuania and Slovenia?
1,903 constant 2015 US$, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovenia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Slovenia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Lithuania ranks 40th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/lithuania/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/lithuania/slovenia/">Lithuania vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.