Least developed countries vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Least developed countries
1,018 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Lithuania
22,070 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Least developed countries rank
43rd
Lithuania rank
40th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Lithuania
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199120082025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 22,070 constant 2015 US$ against 1,018 constant 2015 US$ in Least developed countries, a difference of 21,052 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 21.7 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 46 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 690.49 constant 2015 US$ 4,026 constant 2015 US$ 3,336 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2000s 786.47 constant 2015 US$ 6,026 constant 2015 US$ 5,239 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2010s 997.42 constant 2015 US$ 12,161 constant 2015 US$ 11,164 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania
2020s 1,009 constant 2015 US$ 20,389 constant 2015 US$ 19,380 constant 2015 US$ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Least developed countries or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 22,070 constant 2015 US$ against 1,018 constant 2015 US$ in Least developed countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Least developed countries and Lithuania?
21,052 constant 2015 US$, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Least developed countries and Lithuania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Least developed countries ranks 43rd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/least-developed-countries-un-classification/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/least-developed-countries-un-classification/lithuania/">Least developed countries vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.