Latvia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Latvia
15,095 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Palestine, State of
14,072 constant 2015 US$
in 2022
Latvia rank
58th
Palestine, State of rank
61st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Latvia
  • Palestine, State of
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199420092025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 15,095 constant 2015 US$ against 14,072 constant 2015 US$ in Palestine, State of, a difference of 1,023 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Palestine, State of's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Latvia ranks 58th and Palestine, State of ranks 61st of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 3,146 constant 2015 US$ 10,473 constant 2015 US$ 7,327 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2000s 6,426 constant 2015 US$ 9,104 constant 2015 US$ 2,678 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2010s 13,004 constant 2015 US$ 14,651 constant 2015 US$ 1,647 constant 2015 US$ Palestine, State of
2020s 17,930 constant 2015 US$ 15,623 constant 2015 US$ 2,307 constant 2015 US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Latvia or Palestine, State of?
Latvia, at 15,095 constant 2015 US$ against 14,072 constant 2015 US$ in Palestine, State of as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Latvia and Palestine, State of?
1,023 constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Palestine, State of?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Latvia and Palestine, State of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Latvia ranks 58th and Palestine, State of ranks 61st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/latvia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/latvia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Latvia vs Palestine, State of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.