Iceland vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Iceland
118,433 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Netherlands
89,045 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Iceland rank
4th
Netherlands rank
5th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Iceland
  • Netherlands
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k199120082025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 118,433 constant 2015 US$ against 89,045 constant 2015 US$ in Netherlands, a difference of 29,388 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Netherlands's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 175 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 71,559 constant 2015 US$ 36,620 constant 2015 US$ 34,939 constant 2015 US$ Iceland
2000s 86,919 constant 2015 US$ 42,834 constant 2015 US$ 44,085 constant 2015 US$ Iceland
2010s 109,814 constant 2015 US$ 67,317 constant 2015 US$ 42,497 constant 2015 US$ Iceland
2020s 127,158 constant 2015 US$ 83,468 constant 2015 US$ 43,691 constant 2015 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Iceland or Netherlands?
Iceland, at 118,433 constant 2015 US$ against 89,045 constant 2015 US$ in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Iceland and Netherlands?
29,388 constant 2015 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Netherlands?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Netherlands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Iceland ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/iceland/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/iceland/netherlands/">Iceland vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.