Hong Kong, China vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Hong Kong, China
23,547 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Slovenia
23,973 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
38th
Slovenia rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Slovenia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199520102025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 23,973 constant 2015 US$ against 23,547 constant 2015 US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 426 constant 2015 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 175 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 32,458 constant 2015 US$ 9,915 constant 2015 US$ 22,543 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 25,371 constant 2015 US$ 12,839 constant 2015 US$ 12,531 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 24,478 constant 2015 US$ 21,557 constant 2015 US$ 2,921 constant 2015 US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Hong Kong, China or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 23,973 constant 2015 US$ against 23,547 constant 2015 US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
426 constant 2015 US$, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Slovenia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Hong Kong, China ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/hong-kong-sar-china/slovenia/">Hong Kong, China vs Slovenia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.