Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 9,193 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 45,895 constant 2015 US$.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 6.0 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 46 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,911 constant 2015 US$ | 35,061 constant 2015 US$ | 32,150 constant 2015 US$ | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 3,832 constant 2015 US$ | 43,184 constant 2015 US$ | 39,353 constant 2015 US$ | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 5,937 constant 2015 US$ | 49,598 constant 2015 US$ | 43,661 constant 2015 US$ | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 8,171 constant 2015 US$ | 50,634 constant 2015 US$ | 42,463 constant 2015 US$ | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 9,193 constant 2015 US$ in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Zealand?
- 45,895 constant 2015 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Zealand?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.