Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Equatorial Guinea
723.71 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Uganda
803.96 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th
Uganda rank
163rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Uganda
02505007501.0k199120082025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 803.96 constant 2015 US$ against 723.71 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 80.25 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Uganda ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Uganda ranks 163rd of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 834.42 constant 2015 US$ 954.78 constant 2015 US$ 120.36 constant 2015 US$ Uganda
2010s 805.05 constant 2015 US$ 799.51 constant 2015 US$ 5.53 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2020s 720.51 constant 2015 US$ 766.72 constant 2015 US$ 46.2 constant 2015 US$ Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Equatorial Guinea or Uganda?
Uganda, at 803.96 constant 2015 US$ against 723.71 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Equatorial Guinea and Uganda?
80.25 constant 2015 US$, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Uganda?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Uganda ranks 163rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/equatorial-guinea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/equatorial-guinea/uganda/">Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.