Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Equatorial Guinea
723.71 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Mozambique
498.45 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th
Mozambique rank
169th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mozambique
2004006008001.0k199120082025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 723.71 constant 2015 US$ against 498.45 constant 2015 US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 225.26 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Mozambique's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Mozambique ranks 169th of 175 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 834.42 constant 2015 US$ 388.29 constant 2015 US$ 446.12 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 805.05 constant 2015 US$ 472.01 constant 2015 US$ 333.04 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea
2020s 720.51 constant 2015 US$ 503.18 constant 2015 US$ 217.34 constant 2015 US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Equatorial Guinea or Mozambique?
Equatorial Guinea, at 723.71 constant 2015 US$ against 498.45 constant 2015 US$ in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
225.26 constant 2015 US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Mozambique ranks 169th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/equatorial-guinea/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/equatorial-guinea/mozambique/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.