East Asia & Pacific vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

East Asia & Pacific
6,991 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
New Zealand
55,088 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific rank
17th
New Zealand rank
14th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • New Zealand
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 6,991 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 48,097 constant 2015 US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 7.9 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 46 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 1,509 constant 2015 US$ 35,061 constant 2015 US$ 33,552 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2000s 2,123 constant 2015 US$ 43,184 constant 2015 US$ 41,061 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2010s 3,946 constant 2015 US$ 49,598 constant 2015 US$ 45,652 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand
2020s 6,057 constant 2015 US$ 50,634 constant 2015 US$ 44,577 constant 2015 US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, East Asia & Pacific or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 55,088 constant 2015 US$ against 6,991 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between East Asia & Pacific and New Zealand?
48,097 constant 2015 US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/new-zealand/">East Asia & Pacific vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.