East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

East Asia & Pacific
6,991 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Luxembourg
45,679 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
17th
Luxembourg rank
19th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Luxembourg
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199120082025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 45,679 constant 2015 US$ against 6,991 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 38,688 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 6.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 46 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Luxembourg Difference Ahead
1990s 1,678 constant 2015 US$ 53,903 constant 2015 US$ 52,224 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2000s 2,123 constant 2015 US$ 47,463 constant 2015 US$ 45,340 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2010s 3,946 constant 2015 US$ 43,127 constant 2015 US$ 39,181 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg
2020s 6,212 constant 2015 US$ 39,922 constant 2015 US$ 33,710 constant 2015 US$ Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, East Asia & Pacific or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 45,679 constant 2015 US$ against 6,991 constant 2015 US$ in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
38,688 constant 2015 US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Luxembourg rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Luxembourg ranks 19th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/east-asia-and-pacific/luxembourg/">East Asia & Pacific vs Luxembourg: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.