Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Czechia
37,308 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Pacific island small states
3,278 constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Czechia rank
29th
Pacific island small states rank
30th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Czechia
  • Pacific island small states
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199320092025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 37,308 constant 2015 US$ against 3,278 constant 2015 US$ in Pacific island small states, a difference of 34,030 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Czechia's figure about 11.4 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 29th and Pacific island small states ranks 30th of 175 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Pacific island small states Difference Ahead
1990s 15,018 constant 2015 US$ 3,954 constant 2015 US$ 11,064 constant 2015 US$ Czechia
2000s 23,515 constant 2015 US$ 3,616 constant 2015 US$ 19,899 constant 2015 US$ Czechia
2010s 27,806 constant 2015 US$ 3,239 constant 2015 US$ 24,567 constant 2015 US$ Czechia
2020s 33,751 constant 2015 US$ 3,252 constant 2015 US$ 30,499 constant 2015 US$ Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Czechia or Pacific island small states?
Czechia, at 37,308 constant 2015 US$ against 3,278 constant 2015 US$ in Pacific island small states as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Czechia and Pacific island small states?
34,030 constant 2015 US$, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Pacific island small states?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Pacific island small states rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Czechia ranks 29th and Pacific island small states ranks 30th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/czechia/pacific-island-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/czechia/pacific-island-small-states/">Czechia vs Pacific island small states: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.