Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Costa Rica
11,286 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Tunisia
10,315 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
70th
Tunisia rank
73rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tunisia
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120082025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 11,286 constant 2015 US$ against 10,315 constant 2015 US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 971 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 73rd of 175 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 7,380 constant 2015 US$ 4,146 constant 2015 US$ 3,233 constant 2015 US$ Costa Rica
2000s 8,674 constant 2015 US$ 5,074 constant 2015 US$ 3,599 constant 2015 US$ Costa Rica
2010s 8,956 constant 2015 US$ 7,444 constant 2015 US$ 1,512 constant 2015 US$ Costa Rica
2020s 10,104 constant 2015 US$ 9,822 constant 2015 US$ 282.28 constant 2015 US$ Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Costa Rica or Tunisia?
Costa Rica, at 11,286 constant 2015 US$ against 10,315 constant 2015 US$ in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Costa Rica and Tunisia?
971 constant 2015 US$, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tunisia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Tunisia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Costa Rica ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/costa-rica/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/costa-rica/tunisia/">Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.