Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
286.21 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
South Sudan
487.05 constant 2015 US$
in 2015
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
174th
South Sudan rank
171st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • South Sudan
200300400500199120082025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 487.05 constant 2015 US$ against 286.21 constant 2015 US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 200.84 constant 2015 US$.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.7 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 175 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 267 constant 2015 US$ 451.43 constant 2015 US$ 184.43 constant 2015 US$ South Sudan
2010s 248.26 constant 2015 US$ 415.66 constant 2015 US$ 167.41 constant 2015 US$ South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 487.05 constant 2015 US$ against 286.21 constant 2015 US$ in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2015.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan?
200.84 constant 2015 US$, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/congo-dem-rep/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/congo-dem-rep/south-sudan/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.