China vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

China
8,631 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Egypt
8,942 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
China rank
79th
Egypt rank
77th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • China
  • Egypt
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120082025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 8,942 constant 2015 US$ against 8,631 constant 2015 US$ in China, a difference of 311 constant 2015 US$.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

China ranks 79th and Egypt ranks 77th of 175 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 1,248 constant 2015 US$ 3,354 constant 2015 US$ 2,106 constant 2015 US$ Egypt
2000s 1,913 constant 2015 US$ 4,051 constant 2015 US$ 2,138 constant 2015 US$ Egypt
2010s 4,221 constant 2015 US$ 5,417 constant 2015 US$ 1,196 constant 2015 US$ Egypt
2020s 7,422 constant 2015 US$ 8,345 constant 2015 US$ 923.82 constant 2015 US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, China or Egypt?
Egypt, at 8,942 constant 2015 US$ against 8,631 constant 2015 US$ in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between China and Egypt?
311 constant 2015 US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Egypt?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do China and Egypt rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
China ranks 79th and Egypt ranks 77th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/china/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/china/egypt-arab-rep/">China vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.