Central Europe and the Baltics vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker

Central Europe and the Baltics
15,222 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Norway
75,590 constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
8th
Norway rank
6th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Norway
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120082025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 75,590 constant 2015 US$ against 15,222 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 60,368 constant 2015 US$.

That makes Norway's figure about 5.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 8th and Norway ranks 6th of 46 groups.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 4,654 constant 2015 US$ 33,061 constant 2015 US$ 28,407 constant 2015 US$ Norway
2000s 6,258 constant 2015 US$ 49,257 constant 2015 US$ 42,999 constant 2015 US$ Norway
2010s 8,921 constant 2015 US$ 91,000 constant 2015 US$ 82,079 constant 2015 US$ Norway
2020s 12,730 constant 2015 US$ 84,349 constant 2015 US$ 71,619 constant 2015 US$ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker, Central Europe and the Baltics or Norway?
Norway, at 75,590 constant 2015 US$ against 15,222 constant 2015 US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker between Central Europe and the Baltics and Norway?
60,368 constant 2015 US$, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Norway?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 8th and Norway ranks 6th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker. Statizoid, drawing on World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-per-worker-constant-2015-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/norway/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
World Development Indicators database, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
221 places, 7,177 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.